In subsection 247(2) of the Income Tax Act, the transfer pricing adjustment rules apply if transactions undertaken by non-arm’s length parties do not reflect arm’s length terms and conditions. In “McKesson Canada Corporation v. The Queen”, Tax court found that other method was the most appropriate method regarding the appropriate pricing of risk than those set out in the OECD Guidelines to use. McKesson was the first prior transfer pricing decision to be published in Canada since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision regarding Canada v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. At last, McKesson Canada filed a notice to appeal the Tax Court’s ruling to the Federal Court of Appeal.
Related Posts
Canada: Supreme Court rejects Husky Energy bid to challenge dividend tax ruling
The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed Husky Energy Inc.'s application for leave to appeal on 3 September 2026. The
Read More
Canada expands tax breaks with permanent Productivity Mega Deduction to attract global investment
Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a new tax measure on 15 August 2026 aimed at strengthening Canada's
Read More
Canada introduces priority tax rulings for investments of CAD 1 billion or more
Canada’s Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne announced on 14 September 2026 that the Canada Revenue Agency
Read More
Canada concludes budget 2026 consultations
Canada's Department of Finance announced on 9 September 2026 that it has concluded its pre-budget consultation process,
Read More
US implements broad bans on Canadian imports as trade dispute intensifies
The US has prohibited imports of Canadian alcoholic beverages, motorcycles, and dairy products, effective 29 September
Read More
Canada enacts retaliatory tariffs on US imports as trade negotiations collapse
Canada has enacted retaliatory tariffs today, 8 September 2026, just after midnight, covering nearly USD 28 billion in
Read More