In subsection 247(2) of the Income Tax Act, the transfer pricing adjustment rules apply if transactions undertaken by non-arm’s length parties do not reflect arm’s length terms and conditions. In “McKesson Canada Corporation v. The Queen”, Tax court found that other method was the most appropriate method regarding the appropriate pricing of risk than those set out in the OECD Guidelines to use. McKesson was the first prior transfer pricing decision to be published in Canada since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision regarding Canada v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. At last, McKesson Canada filed a notice to appeal the Tax Court’s ruling to the Federal Court of Appeal.
Related Posts
Canada adjusts retaliatory US tariffs, excludes seafood sector
Canada's Department of Finance removed seafood and fish products from its counter-tariff list on 26 August 2026,
Read More
Canada announces retaliatory tariffs, CAD 7.5 billion support package to mitigate impact from US
Following the US imposition of a 50% tariff on USD 27.6 billion of Canadian goods effective 22 August, Canada has
Read More
US: Trump administration escalates tariff threat on Canadian automotive sector
President Donald Trump announced plans to impose 50% tariffs on all vehicles, trucks, and automotive parts originating
Read More
Canada suspends US trade negotiations, retaliates with matching tariffs
Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on 21 August 2026 that Canada's government has halted negotiations with the US
Read More
US delays 50% additional tariffs on certain Canadian goods
The US has delayed the imposition of 50% additional tariffs on certain Canadian goods by three days as the two
Read More
US set to impose 50% tariffs on Canadian goods
The US is set to impose 50% tariffs on nearly USD 20 billion of Canadian goods beginning 19 August 2026, according to
Read More